When I stick my foot in something, I do it with gusto.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benson, the vote was started on the 30th and there was a weekend in the > middle. I agree its not as fast as it could be but that's not an unusual > time to vote someone in. We have to run background checks, check the > platforms, check the voting record etc. before giving the +1 you know! > > ;-) > > Sanjiva. > > Benson Margulies wrote: >> >> Or lack of a vote :-). The vote may be proving that the commons-ws >> community is so anemic that the PMC needs to push the reboot button. >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Right. Hopefully the PMC members will take a look at the VOTE >>> happening on commons-dev@ when they get a minute off the axis-dev >>> mailing list. >>> >>> -- dims >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Monday 03 November 2008 12:46:42 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So, should all synapse and cxf folks have access to all these >>>>> projects? What say you? >>>> >>>> No. It's still a community and thus the normal meritocracy rules >>>> apply. >>>> >>>> That said, some of those projects may need a swift kick in the pants to >>>> get >>>> them moving again and getting some fresh blood into them. There are >>>> several >>>> outstanding patches and requests and such that could warrant some votes >>>> on >>>> some new people. It shouldn't be hard for a CXF person or Axis2 >>>> persons or >>>> anyone else to become a committer through the normal means. >>>> Unfortunately, >>>> that hasn't been working too well lately. Getting the projects >>>> promoted a >>>> level may help increase some awareness which may help as would looking >>>> at the >>>> interested people and seeing if they do deserve committership or not. >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -- dims >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday 03 November 2008 10:14:30 am Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Glen, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Was looking at >>>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Proposals/Axis2TLPProposal >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any thoughts on why leave behind XmlSchema, Neethi, Axiom? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because they are used by several other projects that have nothing to >>>>>>> do >>>>>>> with Axis 2? >>>>>> >>>>>> Exactly. I do NOT think (re: the other thread) that Axiom should be a >>>>>> TLP, and I do think that all of these libraries make sense as "Web >>>>>> Services" components with a shared committer-base working on them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> --Glen >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kulp >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> http://dankulp.com/blog >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com >>> > > > -- > Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. > Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ > Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/ > > Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ >
