Let's please keep it as a parallel optional implementation. just like we have so many components with specific interfaces and multiple implementations. If/when we finally see the promised results, all we need to do is switch the default to the other implementation.
thanks, dims On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am asking for the MIME4J implementation to be an option. Not the > default. Default should be what is in right now. > > thanks, > dims > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Asankha et al >>> >>> The patch was meant as a replacement for the existing implementation. It >>> is pointless to have two MIME frameworks in Axiom. Just forget about the >>> patch. >>> >>> Oleg >> >> -1! I think we should evaluate this patch just like any other. I'm not >> clear what Dims is asking I'm afraid, but I certainly don't want to >> forget about the patch. >> >> Paul >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
