If we are going to take that approach we should have a clear set of
criteria and tests to decide what should be the default. Dims, can you
help improve the test coverage so we know what this patch is aiming
for?

Thanks
Paul


On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's please keep it as a parallel optional implementation. just like
> we have so many components with specific interfaces and multiple
> implementations. If/when we finally see the promised results, all we
> need to do is switch the default to the other implementation.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am asking for the MIME4J implementation to be an option. Not the
>> default. Default should be what is in right now.
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Asankha et al
>>>>
>>>> The patch was meant as a replacement for the existing implementation. It
>>>> is pointless to have two MIME frameworks in Axiom. Just forget about the
>>>> patch.
>>>>
>>>> Oleg
>>>
>>> -1! I think we should evaluate this patch just like any other. I'm not
>>> clear what Dims is asking I'm afraid, but I certainly don't want to
>>> forget about the patch.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



-- 
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Reply via email to