Andreas, As I said I was just looking through the distributed transaction implementation in JMS transport and observed the above. I am not sure why there is a tight couple between the JTA transaction created in JMSListener and the JMSSender is using it. Any way I'll try out my scenario and see how it goes.
Rajika On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected]>wrote: > If Synapse invokes the sender on the thread on which the transaction > is running (and if the JMS connection factories are set up correctly), > then it should automatically participate in this transaction. What > kind of issue are you seeing with the current implementation of the > JMS sender? > > Andreas > >
