Rajika, Glad to hear that it worked.
Andreas On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:58, Rajika Kumarasiri <raj...@wso2.com> wrote: > Andreas, > I just tried out this scenario and it works fine. I just use the transaction > mediator to mark the start/end/rollback of the JTA transaction and JMS > sender participated in that transaction, and I didn't configure anything > related to JTA in JMS sender. > > Rajika > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <raj...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Andreas, >> As I said I was just looking through the distributed transaction >> implementation in JMS transport and observed the above. I am not sure why >> there is a tight couple between the JTA transaction created in JMSListener >> and the JMSSender is using it. Any way I'll try out my scenario and see how >> it goes. >> >> Rajika >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veit...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> If Synapse invokes the sender on the thread on which the transaction >>> is running (and if the JMS connection factories are set up correctly), >>> then it should automatically participate in this transaction. What >>> kind of issue are you seeing with the current implementation of the >>> JMS sender? >>> >>> Andreas >>> >>> >> >
