On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 08:13 AM, Ortwin Glück wrote:
I've thought about this further and it would be sufficient for any of the GET/POST/BLAH methods to accept a URL (or whatever they have now) and, in addition, an IP address. The intent would be that the resolution process is done outside the HTTPClient library and the info is simply passed in. The library would then not call any InetAddress methods if the address is passed in.Mike Moran wrote:I just thought I'd ask if there was any way to configure the DNS resolver that HTTPClient uses? Does it just rely on the built-in resolver?
Yes it does.
I'll look into it, but I investigated this a year or so ago and then there was no way to replace the client side resolver. Regardless, one of the main reasons I would do this would be to avoid synchronous lookups. Even if the Java API was pluggable, it does not support asynchronous lookups.> Whereabouts would one go about inserting a different one?Ask Sun?
--
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
