There would be a little extra overhead of maintaining the branch. Alternatively the patch will become stale and may be very difficult to apply later so that it would only be useful as a prototype.
What do you say Oleg?
BTW: The patch was never "rejected". We all agree it is good work on the correct path. The problem is only when it makes sense to do this. It appears that I was wrong to target this as a 2.0 feature in the first place.
Jandalf.
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
Hi Laura
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 00:24, Laura Werner wrote:
Hi Oleg,
Please remember those of us who aren't using the HttpClient class right now because it isn't quite flexible enough. If all of the redirect and authentication logic is moved there, I'd also like to see more flexibility, so that we don't have to write our own client classes that duplicate all of the new code that's going into HttpClient.
I do remember about it. In fact, in my initial post you have been personally mentioned to be among those impacted most by the suggested patch ;-) Had not the patch been turned down, I was going to approach you for suggestions on HttpClient improvement.
I guess we will have to refactor HttpMethodBase HttpClient at a point of time after 2.0 release. We will definitely be in need of your feedback
Regards
Oleg
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
