Jeff, no problem with either approaches. I would really welcome
appearance of the 2.1 development branch. At the same time I can simply
reproduce this patch after 2.0 release.

Oleg
    

On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 15:25, Jandalf wrote:
> Odi's suggestion of starting a 2.1 branch now is a reasonable one.  Your 
> patch is good Oleg, just a bit too tramatic for 2.0 right now.  We are 
> getting close to the point where we will want a 2.1 branch anyway.
> 
> There would be a little extra overhead of maintaining the branch. 
>  Alternatively the patch will become stale and may be very difficult to 
> apply later so that it would only be useful as a prototype.
> 
> What do you say Oleg?
> 
> BTW: The patch was never "rejected".  We all agree it is good work on 
> the correct path.  The problem is only when it makes sense to do this. 
>  It appears that I was wrong to target this as a 2.0 feature in the 
> first place.
> 
> Jandalf.
> 
> 
> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> 
> >Hi Laura
> >
> >On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 00:24, Laura Werner wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Hi Oleg,
> >>
> >>Please remember those of us who aren't using the HttpClient class right 
> >>now because it isn't quite flexible enough.  If all of the redirect and 
> >>authentication logic is moved there, I'd also like to see more 
> >>flexibility, so that we don't have to write our own client classes that 
> >>duplicate all of the new code that's going into HttpClient.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I do remember about it. In fact, in my initial post you have been
> >personally mentioned to be among those impacted most by the suggested
> >patch ;-) Had not the patch been turned down, I was going to approach
> >you for suggestions on HttpClient improvement.
> >
> >I guess we will have to refactor HttpMethodBase HttpClient at a point of
> >time after 2.0 release. We will definitely be in need of your feedback
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Oleg
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to