+1 I have a few concerns, though:
1.) URLCodec that we should be using has not been officially released yet 2.) Introduction of an external dependency is (IMHO) also a breach of contract very much like API breakage. I would like to suggest that we keep a copy of relevant codec classes in HttpClient source tree for the 2.1 release. Does anyone see any downsides to that I may be missing? Oleg -----Original Message----- From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 04:20 To: Commons Project Subject: [VOTE] Add commons-codec as an HttpClient dependency I propose that we start using commons-codec (nightly builds) for our Base64 and URL encoding needs. This change would go into effect for the 2.1 release (HEAD). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Vote: commons-codec dependency for 2.1 [ ] +1 I am in favor of this proposal. [ ] -1 I am against this proposal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
