> Well said. The 2.0 release is really not what any of us wanted. I was > also looking to 2.1 as the first release 'done more or less right'. I > think we can still accomplish this. We may just have to ignore the > official guidelines for what constitutes a minor release. > > It sounds like you are leaning towards calling this 3.0, is that correct? >
Not really. I am still fully behind the 2.1 release plan (as long as it remains about 'doing 2.0 more or less right', and not about second attempt at trying to work around the existing design limitations). However, if the pressure mounts to strictly follow the Jakarta release guidelines, I will strongly favour bypassing 2.1 release and going straight to 3.0 Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
