Re: normalizing a URI with ..'s in it ?

[Michael Becke]

I am not positive how this process is being worked out by I would 
suggest sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to Ron Fielding.

Mike

On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 06:16 AM, Mike Moran wrote:

Michael Becke wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 06:18 PM, Mike Moran wrote:
[Oleg agreed] Right. Out of interest, which set of test cases does 
the URI class use, the ones from rfc2396 or rfc2396bis?
The tests are from rfc2396bis.
This is verging rapidly off-topic, but I was wondering if you knew 
anywhere I could keep up-to-date on the standardis track of 
rfc2396bis? I've written some code to do the normalization we were 
talking about and I am swithering about whether I should enable it. 
The different handling of paths such as "/../../" between rfc2396 and 
rfc2396bis may have knock-on effects in my code, so it would be nice 
if they were *standard* knock-on effects :-)

--
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]