> I think we are fairly nearly talking about the same thing. The only > possible difference I see is how the instance of HttpConnectionParams > is obtained. My thought is to pass the instance into HttpClient as a > param to executeMethod() or something similar.
Mike, this is certainly a possibility. What tortures me is realization that with this kind of setup HttpConnection (and possibly HttpConnectionManager) should not have been HttpParams-enabled after all. My initial plan was to enable the user to enumerate HttpConnections contained by the multithreaded connection manager. I guess the plan was ill-conceived > How do you envision controlling access to the hash map of params? I was thinking about some additional methods on the HttpConnectionManager interface, something like HttpConnectionManager#getParamsFor(HostConfiguration). Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
