On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:18, Michael Becke wrote: > > Mike, this is certainly a possibility. What tortures me is > > realization that with this kind of setup HttpConnection (and possibly > > HttpConnectionManager) should not have been HttpParams-enabled after > > all. My initial plan was to enable the user to enumerate > > HttpConnections contained by the multithreaded connection manager. I > > guess the plan was ill-conceived > > We may be coming at this from the wrong angle, but I also think having > the connection configuration is a good thing. My gut reaction at the > moment is that we're trying to do too much with the connection managers. >
Mike, What do you see as a more appropriate place for the HttpConnectionParams map? I have been considering various options and can't think of anything better than the multithreaded connection manager. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
