DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10794 User interaction for authentication ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-01-30 18:48 ------- Oleg, Overall I think the design is good now. I have just a few comments on some of the specifics. - I would prefer the name CredentialsProvider to CredentialsCallback. Though callback works, I think provider is a little more standard. - Also, I am wondering if the CredentialsCallback.getCredentials() method should be changed to accept an instance of HttpAuthRealm instead of the scheme, host, and port. - The callback param is currently assumed to be a Collection, but I wonder if this is really necessary. It seems like just a CredentialsCallback should be sufficient, especially since it can be configured on a per method basic. I haven't had time to look closely at the HttpMethodDirector authentication logic but I think some test cases will take care of that. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
