On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Cary Bass <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mike.lifeguard a écrit :
> > Some time ago, I suggested using Meta for this purpose. That would be
> > the best solution; the second-best being to use Commons and expanding
> > the scope to chapter logos and the like (as I suggested already:
> >
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pikiwiki_logo.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=22003706
> )
> > <
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Pikiwiki_logo.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=22003706%29
> >
> >
> > Either would be acceptable. The status quo is not.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> Another instance where our policies run contrary to our mission.  We
> definitely need to reinvestigate why we are so much in a rush to delete
> images such as these which provide no liability on Commons whatsoever,
> where the distribution of the logo is entirely acceptable and does not
> water down the copyright.
>
> Cary
>

once you start thinking on "possible liabilities" you're walking the fair
use lane on commons.
Commons is by definition a free content file repo. That's akin to saying
"let's host some nonfree articles copied from wikipedia if we can determine
we won't get in trouble"
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to