Hoi,
I really think that you should learn a bit more about trademarks. Your
assume that it is acceptable for graphics that identify an organisation or a
project to be used by everyone. This is not the case.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/6/5 Abigor <[email protected]>
> Hello,
>
> This is maybe a kind of other point of view.
>
> I believe that the mission for the chaptors is to support free media.. But
> with keeping logo's protected under all right reserved that aren't giving
> a good example.
>
> I can understand that the official Wikimedia logos aren't free. But a logo
> for pikiwiki for example can easy be released under cc-by or cc-by-sa and
> that would also give a example for other company's how they should license
> there logo's and photo's.
>
> cc license can be used on Commons without problems.. But how can a
> organisation support free media and upload there own material under a non
> free license..
>
> Huib
>
> Http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Abigor
> msn: [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Commons-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
>
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
