On 17 August 2010 10:25, Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> wrote:
> David Gerard, 17/08/2010 10:44:

>> Hotlinking is fine, and InstantCommons is really really nice and really 
>> usable.

> Yes, IstantCommons is great, but I wouldn't call it "really usable". We
> use it on http://www.wikimedia.it and we often have random errors like
> http://www.wikimedia.it/index.php/File:Failed_to_open_stream.png ,
> especially with big images like those added here
> http://www.wikimedia.it/index.php/5_anni,_5_milioni_di_file_multimediali_su_Wikimedia_Commons
> (obviously this is more frequent when the image scalers are busy; and
> looks like it's happening less frequently, lately, but I'm not sure).


I said it was really usable, I didn't say it was perfectly functional
;-) We use it on rationalwiki.org. Occasionally there are glitches
where the local MediaWiki fails to correctly retrieve a file from
Commons and the failure is cached for a while (up to an hour). But in
general, it works well enough that we don't bother copying images to
the local server at all. I heartily recommend InstantCommons to anyone
with a MediaWiki installation, and should enable it on my work
intranet ;-)


- d.

_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to