And, seriously, David, the law, as it stands, recognises sweat-of-the-brow. The idea that it doesn't is based on the idea that the European Court *might*, at some point in the future, declare that doctrine invalid.
That's not a legal argument, that's fortune telling. On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Adam Cuerden <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear David, > > I'm commenting here because I honestly didn't think Commons could be > acting in a manner that required them to actively ignore laws, and > thought it highly unlikely that Commons would be actively removing > mere requests for credit from works. That Commons apparently is doing > both of those is pretty much my limit for trying to engage with > Commons. > > -Adam _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
