On 08/07/12 19:21, Seth Woodworth wrote:
> The argument you are making are focused on copyright, but when you are
> more specific, you seem to be desiring attribution, and want to ensure
> that that attribution is legally enforceable.  Please forgive me if I am
> putting words in your mouth.
> 
> --Seth

The fact is, it isn't that important that Wikimedia Commons gets
convinced that it's new copyright. A US-based company could ignore the
CC-BY tag and happily reuse it violating the license, and you would have
to assert your copyright (in order to enforce the license) in the court.


_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l

Reply via email to