On 27 June 2014 18:02, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hoi,
> What you are saying is that when Commons is used more, *you* will be less
> likely to consider the position of others. This is EXACTLY the kind of
> argument/position we can do without. What is called for is a willingness to
> listen and consider view points. With a blanket statement like this you
> close the door to dialogue.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
> On 27 June 2014 18:04, Rama Neko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I don't quite know what it means to say that the more Commons is used by
>> other projects the more it becomes a service project (*), but it certainly
>> make its responsibility heavier for stating that a document is under a Free
>> licence. Hence the more Commons is used, the more rigourous it should be.
>> -- Rama
Gerard,
Rama made a general and impersonal statement, your comment makes it a
personal ad hominim one ("*you*"), and attempts to marginalize Rama's
point while putting yourself in superior position of speaking for the
community ("we").
Please don't do that, it's appears pointlessly aggressive and inflamatory.
Fae
--
[email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
_______________________________________________
Commons-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
