I personally believe it's unfortunate it's been named that way. It makes it quite un-JUnit like to me, and inconsistent with the existing Jelly assertEquals. Oh well, I haven't started using Jelly yet, just getting interested by it (and your own interest to it makes it interesting to me ;-)
--DD -----Original Message----- From: Wannheden, Knut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:07 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Users List' Subject: RE: [jelly] unit testing: detecting exceptions Dominique, Funny that you found the same pattern useful in Java aswell. There you at least don't have the problem that the try and catch blocks are disconnected as with Jelly. Well now it's "assertThrown" afterall. See http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/jelly/tags.html#junit:assertThrown . -- knut -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
