From: "Wannheden, Knut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > No, sounds good to me too. First I named it assertFails, but then another > user suggested assertThrown. Later, after sending in the patch, I came to > think of that maybe assertThrows would be better.
Cool - lets call it assertThrows then. Have just patched the code in CVS, so its now assertThrows. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
