From: "Christian Sell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > James Strachan wrote: > > > > Agreed. It should be pretty easy to do - fancy having a go? The existing > > BeanTag and BeanPropertyTag do almost all you need - we'd just need the > > BeanPropertyTag to be able to optionally support addFoo(Foo) methods by > > invoking the no-arg constructor of Foo - right now it just uses the > > createFoo() pattern. > > I have already started to do it. In what format do you want the changes?
Excellent! :-) A patch would be great... http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html#Patches e.g. cvs diff -u Main.java >> patchfile.txt BTW (and forgive me if this is obious) if BeanTag and/or BeanPropertyTag are patched to do what you need, then you'll be able to just reuse these classes as is in your own TagLibrary without the need for inheritence which was one of your early concerns. i.e. its a clean reuse James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
