> Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Phil Steitz wrote: > I will also document this, which I agree is a real limitation. Are we > all OK with this? Anyone other problems with this change?
It looks like making the change should be OK. You could always test for size == MAX_VALUE and use the old less efficient mechanism. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
