Dion,
I thought this was non-affecting in the sense that it just added things that were conditional to a flag which was, by default, disabled.
Yes, I think it would be nice to come into the release, if, indeed, it is as such.
I thought it was in.
paul
Le 23 ao�t 04, � 01:20, Dion Gillard a �crit :
Paul,
did you want the 'strict-mode' patch to go into 1.0?
I'd rather we kept 1.0 to the original functionality, and added new stuff with a 1.1 release.
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:03:36 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I think people using Jexl outside of Jelly should speak here. Peter ?
paul
PS: Dion, is there some documentation somewhere about a "strict-mode" for Jexl which someone offered as a patch about four months ago ?
Le 21 ao�t 04, � 11:18, Dion Gillard a �crit :
In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an Release Candidate.[X] Release Candidate [ ] Beta Release
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
