I am not convinced rehosting Clazz would all of a suddent breath life into it. I was the one Stephen refers to as "another", who wrote all that code. I stopped working on it some time ago because everybody, including Stephen himself apparently abandoned it. Perhaps I was taking it in the wrong direction - don't know. I would be happy to pick up where we dropped it off in Jakarta commons sandbox. The only trouble has been very little to no interest in it.
- Dmitri ----- Original Message ----- From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2004 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [Clazz] Is anybody maintaining this? > > On 3 Sep 2004, at 21:05, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > There are no current maintainers of [clazz]. It was partly my idea, > > but was > > mainly implemented by another. The reality is that I don't have the > > time to > > be able to focus on this project :-( > > > > Stephen > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ihab Awad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I posted a question re commons Clazz a while ago and got no reply. Is > >> anyone working on this? It sure seems like a worthwhile project.... > >> > >> The question was whether there are plans for adding multiple > >> inheritance support to Clazz-es, or whether that's a Bad Idea [TM]. > >> Multiple inheritance would be great for stuff like modeling Bean > >> property patterns and method signatures that are declared in Java > >> interfaces. > > one option would be to start a project over at sourceforge extending > the existing clazz code base... > > - robert > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
