Jacob Kjome wrote:
It looks like the only special characters allowed in the scheme are '+', '-', and '.'. I guess that means my proposed "res*:" protocol is out. Is there a reason that only the said special characters are allowed and not others? Would '*' be ok to add to that list? Or is there a URL standard that you are following here that limits the characters to what has already been specified? If '*' isn't allowed, would it be ok to use "res+:"?
What if we simply name it "classpath:"?
So "res:" uses the default JVM rules and "classpath:" scans the whole classpath.
--- Mario --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
