I am definitely interested in adding support for fields. If you have ideas
of what the best way to go about it would be, I would greatly appreciate it.
T. Dudziak previously Thomas Dudziak that the SetPropertiesRule would be a
good place to start. While going through the source code I noticed that the
SetPropertiesRule uses the BeanUtils' populate method to do the update.
Would you see the field access using a similar/identical approach?
-Guillermo
From: robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Users List" <[email protected]>
To: Jakarta Commons Users List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Can Betwixt/Digester directly access public data members
w/ogetters/setters?
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:33:55 +0000
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 16:10 +0000, Guillermo Bares wrote:
<snip>
> 2) If there is no configuration mechanism, I am willing to extend the
> Betwixt/Digester frameworks. I have a couple ideas on where to start,
but I
> would like to hear others.
for various pretty obscure reasons, i intend to add support for fields
soon. i've got a lot on ATM so i'm not sure when i'd get round to this
but i'd be pleased to help you if you fancy developing a patch for
betwixt (if you're still interested).
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
