> On 13 Nov 2016, at 09:56, Badru Ntege <badru.nt...@nftconsult.com> wrote: > I think this can be brought to rest if we get a position from the Afrinic > Legal council then subsequent legal discussion would be based on a fixed > organisational position.
I have requested a clear statement from the Afrinic legal adviser. However, I am more interested in learning what the members or community would like in the future. Three obvious possibilities are: * Remove the proxy limits; * Keep the proxy limits, but modify the wording of the bylaws to ensure that the bylaws do not conflict with the Companies Act; * Keep the bylaws unchanged, and deal with any legal challenges if they arise. Alan Barrett _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list Community-Discuss@afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss