> On Dec 12, 2018, at 02:38 , Chevalier du Borg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 19:41, Andrew Alston <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > If OIF were try to put french citizen people on AFRINIC board, your argument > will make sense. It is not. If you have evidence to show it has, please share > and tell us how they benefit from it. > > > Actually this claim concerns me more than anything and highlights everything > I believe is wrong with this policy in the first place. Firstly it assumes > facts not yet in evidence – because any “benefit” would assume that > > > > There is sufficient evidence to use this policy against Larus at the request > of a member initiated review – there is no evidence of this > Failing (a) it assumes that Larus will some how come up in “random” review – > which would be far from random > As regards (a) it assumes that there even if a review were done against Larus > that there would be any finding of guilty > > > Since none of those things have been proven nor has any evidence been shown – > and in fact AFRINIC has repeatedly stated that those applications for space > were thoroughly reviewed and vetted – I fail to see how you can claim benefit. > > > > You still avoid how OIF and a member are equivalent. They are not. A member > can potentially benefit or suffer from this proposal - not so OIF. That the > point. > > > As to everything having been review and ok by AFRINIC, please note that every > one of the multinational company that rape this continent usually obey the > LETTER of the law.
Then make better laws. The review policy won’t solve the problem you have stated here. Owen
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
