Hi, > The best thing to do with the review policy is to abandon it. Unfortunately, > despite sustained opposition and an inability to bring it to consensus, the > authors persist.
At some point the chairs are perfectly allowed to declare non-consensus and drop the proposal. It's their responsibility to make sure this working group functions, and wasting time on a proposal that is not getting consensus is harmful to this working group and its participants. It's not something to be done lightly, but I think that time has come… Sander
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
