Hello Sander, Can you point to the section of the PDP which allows chairs to make such decision?
We have to stick to the PDP which has been declared by some as not broken. If you think like us, that the PDP needs improvement, please say so and contribute to the discussions around PDP-bis. Thanks - Komi Le ven. 13 déc. 2019 à 14:16, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > > The best thing to do with the review policy is to abandon it. > Unfortunately, despite sustained opposition and an inability to bring it to > consensus, the authors persist. > > At some point the chairs are perfectly allowed to declare non-consensus > and drop the proposal. It's their responsibility to make sure this working > group functions, and wasting time on a proposal that is not getting > consensus is harmful to this working group and its participants. > > It's not something to be done lightly, but I think that time has come… > Sander > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > -- --KE
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
