Hi, I’d like to remind everyone out that a candidate for a campaign, as well as offering and suggesting to vote for a suitable and competent candidate, may be a rewarding experience. Many campaigns receive requests for recommendations and promotions on a regular basis. The premise is that you should propose someone who knows what the community is all about from the inside. As a result, many campaigns evaluate the following elements before making the decision of voting:
« • Is the candidate well-qualified for the position? • Does the candidate have a good work ethic? • Will the candidate's behavior or performance potentially have a negative effect on the community in any way? » For the record, as long as the technique follows the campaign's internal protocols, it is usually acceptable. If there are no such protocols for providing personal suggestions, there are a few options: « • In a small campaign, talk to the boss personally to say you'd like to make a recommendation via a personal introduction. • Providing Appropriate Details Whether you write a letter or make a personal introduction on the candidate's behalf, the way in which you describe candidate can make or break his chances. Focus on a few things in your recommendation: • the candidate 's background, education and experience » As previously stated, this is standard practice for many campaigns, so there is no reason to single out Paul and dismiss his candidacy for something that is not incorrect. Instead, let us mainstream this method among our community and focus on what truly important. Cheers
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
