Dear Ali, Well stated.
Regards, Murungi Daniel > On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:47 PM, Ali Hussein <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have been following this saga for a few days now and I can't help but > wonder (And this is aside from discussing the case of Cloud Innovation and > AfriNIC) I want to address the process of Mauritian law. > > How does a court in Mauritius freeze the bank accounts of another company > through ex parte proceedings? For those who might not understand what I mean > - ex parte is done with respect to or in the interests of one side only or of > an interested outside party. This is a basic tenet in law. Was Afrinic given > an opportunity to defend itself before these orders to freeze its accounts > were given? Or were summons given and Afrinic ignored them? > > If the former is true then maybe it's time to address the issue of the > domicility of Afrinic. Maybe Mauritius is too hostile for a Pan-African-based > organization. How else do you interpreter this? A court giving an > unprecedented ex parte ruling against an African Organization in favor of a > Hongkong-based organization who we are all clear is a purveyor of African IP > Addresses to organizations outside of Africa as its core business model. > > Let's put aside all this hullabaloo of ohh...The board didn't do this...Oooh > the board should have done this! and let's address the elephant in the room. > Everything else is a sideshow. > > > Ali Hussein > Digital Transformation > > Tel: +254 713 601113 > Twitter: @AliHKassim > Skype: abu-jomo > LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim > <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim> > > > > Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely mine > and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the organizations > that I work with. > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:31 AM Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > In message <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, > Owen DeLong <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> That is certainly NOT a document that I have seen. > > > >Understandable, since as I stated, it was a private message sent by > >Respondent to Petitioner. > > > >I am seeking approval from our legal team to provide it. > > Well, no offense Owen, but I also have in my posession a document that > definitively proves that you are Satan. I would like to share that > with everyone, but my lawyer won't let me. Until he does however > I think that everyone should just take it on faith, because I'm > always right and I never lie. > :-) > > > Regards, > rfg > > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss > <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss> > _______________________________________________ > Community-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
