Hi Ali,

Apt. I quite agree with your view on Mauritius legal system.

*Best Regards,*

*Anthony*


On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:50 AM Ali Hussein <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have been following this saga for a few days now and I can't help but
> wonder (And this is aside from discussing the case of Cloud Innovation and
> AfriNIC) I want to address the process of Mauritian law.
>
> How does a court in Mauritius freeze the bank accounts of another company
> through ex parte proceedings? For those who might not understand what I
> mean - *ex parte is **done with respect to or in the interests of one
> side only or of an interested outside party. *This is a basic tenet in
> law. Was Afrinic given an opportunity to defend itself before these orders
> to freeze its accounts were given? Or were summons given and Afrinic
> ignored them?
>
> If the former is true then maybe it's time to address the issue of the
> domicility of Afrinic. Maybe Mauritius is too hostile for a
> Pan-African-based organization. How else do you interpreter this? A court
> giving an unprecedented ex parte ruling against an African Organization in
> favor of a Hongkong-based organization who we are all clear is a purveyor
> of African IP Addresses to organizations outside of Africa as its core
> business model.
>
> Let's put aside all this hullabaloo of ohh...The board didn't do
> this...Oooh the board should have done this! and let's address the elephant
> in the room. Everything else is a sideshow.
>
>
> *Ali Hussein*
>
> Digital Transformation
>
>
> Tel: +254 713 601113
>
> Twitter: @AliHKassim
>
> Skype: abu-jomo
>
> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim>
>
>
>
>
> Any information of a personal nature expressed in this email are purely
> mine and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the
> organizations that I work with.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:31 AM Ronald F. Guilmette <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In message <[email protected]>,
>> Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >> That is certainly NOT a document that I have seen.
>> >
>> >Understandable, since as I stated, it was a private message sent by
>> >Respondent to Petitioner.
>> >
>> >I am seeking approval from our legal team to provide it.
>>
>> Well, no offense Owen, but I also have in my posession a document that
>> definitively proves that you are Satan.  I would like to share that
>> with everyone, but my lawyer won't let me.  Until he does however
>> I think that everyone should just take it on faith, because I'm
>> always right and I never lie.
>> :-)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> rfg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Community-Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Community-Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Community-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss

Reply via email to