In message <[email protected]>, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Show me where AFRINIC took *any* action to in any way remove any of its >> bank assets or to place any of them in any place outside of the jurisdiction >> of, or beyond the control of the court. > >AFRINIC has relatively limited income. They have a burn rate that is not far >from their income. Their day to day expenses, especially in light of their >propensity for board travel, etc. could easily be used to dissipate a >substantial >fraction of their current holdings... That's bullshit. The entire AFRINIC budget for 2015, which I saw, was something just a bit north of $4 million USD. I suspect that the organization proabbly has at least 1/4 of that amount on hand and in the bank at any given time to pay expenses. So where exactly do you think the jet-setting board members are going to fly off to that is going to cost even a "substantial fraction" of that? Mars? Owen, the more you talk, the more laughable and the more extreme you get. >which fall well short of what the courts >consider to be a likely judgment in the case. Stop lying and stop putting words into the mouth of the judge. The court has rendered -no- opinion on the "likely judgment in the case". Indeed, the court hasn't even begun to consider the merits of the case. All that has happened is that one judge made a decision to do exactly and only what Lu Heng's high-priced and undoubtedly well-connected Appleby lawyer asked that judge to do, and only in a one-sided EX PARTE context, where only one side was even present to argue its side of things. That's not even a remotely fair way to decide such weighty and consequential matters, and it reeks like a whore house at low tide. >>> The only reason the restraint "threatens" the >>> existence of the organization is because the organizations finances have >>> not been arranged in a proper way. >> >> That is also bullshit. > >Not entirely so, no. Prove it. Where is the actual evidence that AFRINIC's "finances have not been arranged in a proper way"? It is "put up or shut up" time, for ALL of the speculative and false assertions that have been made here, based on absoluetly -zero- actual evidence. >The true value expressed in the law suit is $1.8 billion USD. Thank you for at least being honest about this one already known and established public fact. Regards, rfg _______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
