Dear AfriNIC's Community, Please see my comment below, inline...
Le mer. 4 août 2021 à 3:10 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette <[email protected]> a écrit : > In message <[email protected]>, > Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Show me where AFRINIC took *any* action to in any way remove any of its > >> bank assets or to place any of them in any place outside of the > jurisdiction > >> of, or beyond the control of the court. > > > >AFRINIC has relatively limited income. They have a burn rate that is not > far > >from their income. Their day to day expenses, especially in light of their > >propensity for board travel, etc. could easily be used to dissipate a > substantial > >fraction of their current holdings... > > That's bullshit. The entire AFRINIC budget for 2015, which I saw, was > something just a bit north of $4 million USD. Hi Ronald, Thanks for your email, brother. ...i add the source[1], to give an opportunity to everyone to check by themselves. __ [1]: <https://afrinic.net/finance> ...exact budget revenue for 2015 is: $4,135,783 ...exact budget revenue for 2021 is: $6,067,875 Shalom, --sb. I suspect that the > organization proabbly has at least 1/4 of that amount on hand and in > the bank at any given time to pay expenses. > > So where exactly do you think the jet-setting board members are going to > fly off to that is going to cost even a "substantial fraction" of that? > Mars? > > Owen, the more you talk, the more laughable and the more extreme you get. > > >which fall well short of what the courts > >consider to be a likely judgment in the case. > > Stop lying and stop putting words into the mouth of the judge. The court > has rendered -no- opinion on the "likely judgment in the case". Indeed, > the court hasn't even begun to consider the merits of the case. All that > has happened is that one judge made a decision to do exactly and only > what Lu Heng's high-priced and undoubtedly well-connected Appleby lawyer > asked that judge to do, and only in a one-sided EX PARTE context, where > only one side was even present to argue its side of things. > > That's not even a remotely fair way to decide such weighty and > consequential > matters, and it reeks like a whore house at low tide. > > >>> The only reason the restraint "threatens" the > >>> existence of the organization is because the organizations finances > have > >>> not been arranged in a proper way. > >> > >> That is also bullshit. > > > >Not entirely so, no. > > Prove it. > > Where is the actual evidence that AFRINIC's "finances have not been > arranged > in a proper way"? > > It is "put up or shut up" time, for ALL of the speculative and false > assertions that have been made here, based on absoluetly -zero- actual > evidence. > > >The true value expressed in the law suit is $1.8 billion USD. > > Thank you for at least being honest about this one already known and > established public fact. > > > Regards, > rfg > > [...]
_______________________________________________ Community-Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss
