--- James Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are you changing the vote here? > > I would like to vote but you have changed the > direction of this vote, in a > way that's really wierd. > > Currently, as i understand it, the last vote favored > opening the list to > invited experts, with a public archive. How would I > vote that here? > > -- james
I think you want to vote +1 on the first issue and -1 on the second issue, with a subsequent vote later (if it's even necessary) to extend access to invited guests. The last vote was essentially a free-for-all write-in with no clear result IMO. You interpreted the last vote as allowing a public archive, but one could easily assert that the option 3, no public archive, won because it received the most votes. The contrary interpretation is that the public archive opinion won because options 1 and 2 both allow an archive and received more combined votes than option 3. It was an unclear format. - Morgan ===== Morgan Delagrange http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs http://jakarta.apache.org/commons http://axion.tigris.org http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
