Hey all,

--- Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:

[snip]

> >>>VOTE 2:  would you like to make it possible for
> non-committers to
> >>>fully subscribe to this mail list?
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 yes, let's open it to everyone
> >>> [ ]  0 don't know/don't care
> >>> [X] -1 no, let's keep it for committers only
> >>>      
> >>>
> >...OR THOSE INVITED
> >
> 
> Ditto.
> 

Actually, specifying invitees as a qualification to
the -1 may not be necessary, if each invitee will need
to be voted in individually anyway.  Only if invitees
may be added without a vote do we need to resolve the
matter, and that's probably worthy of a specific
second vote if -1 proves the majority opinion.

Just pointing out that you probably needn't worry
about this detail.  IMO we should wait for the -1
result, and then determine the terms by which we will
add invitees.

- Morgan  

=====
Morgan Delagrange
http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
http://axion.tigris.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/watchdog

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

Reply via email to