Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > No, not a PMC. I mean a method for *all* committers of a > > project to be able to discuss certain things in private. > > Heh, it's the project that rules how the PMC is composed! I will be in > favor of making every committer that wants to be part of the PMC, part > of it. Like it happens on HTTPD. > > The PMC concept, in fact, was designed after *that*! > > > > > I notice that you expressed similar reasoning to my first > > paragraph, in your other reply to this thread. It was the > > success of that small-group off-line proposal and subsequent > > on-line vote of Nicola Ken committer, that sparked my reply too. > > Yes, I noticed this. > > But think about it: if cocoon is a project and all the committers that > care enough are part of the PMC and are the legal protectors of the code > and there is one official representative that talks directly to the > board and can report problems or achievements. Wouldn't it be all much > lighter and clean?
Aha, thanks, now it is all clear. The PMCs are the missing link. ... a place to discuss certain occasional private project issues. I was under the impression that PMCs were a subset of committers, but now i see that it can be all who are interested. That solves it - i can now go and vote for "community" list to be fully open. --David
