Can someone summarize what's wrong with the gump descriptor used by all jakarta and xml projects ?
I understand we may need to add more stuff ( maybe using some ns: ), but I don't quite understand why we need to change existing definitions. Costin On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 14:08, John Keyes wrote: > <snip/> > > > If the answer to above is yes : cool and from a maven perspective the > > > above > > > is what can be offered, based on the maven project.xml, and I can write a > > > maven plugin to generate that xml. > > > If you had something different in mind, please explain ;) > > > > What you propose is simply a subset of what I envision. > > > > With the above descriptor, we can create both a centralized page with > > the summaries for all projects *and* project summary pages. > > It sounds like it would make sense if maven was modified > to import a projectinfo document and therefore it could > generate the project page using it. This would support > the vision of it being tool agnostic. > > -John K > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
