Sander Striker wrote:
>
> My point is that quite a number of people won't have the time
> (or inclination) to do so. And because they don't, they aren't
> listed*.
:
> Currently the list (auto created) on Kens page holds about
> 40 committers. How many committers do we have in total?
> Somewhere between 550 and 600. 40 isn't exactly an accurate
> representation of our community, is it?
so the issue is painting the list as being representative, then?
fine; we just mark it as 'asf people who have bothered to list
pages here.'
> I'm not. I'm just saying that on the members page _all_ members
> are listed.
what's the relevance? the members page says 'these are the members'.
i don't recall seeing anyone say the list of ~name pages was to
be labeled 'these are the asf committers'. quite otherwise, in fact;
i've seen suggestions that it be clearly marked as incomplete and
opt-in.
