'nother thought. do we want to include in the karma column modules which aren't available through anoncvs/viewcvs?
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing - we shouldn't include ones that aren't publically available. Perhaps we should have a list of 'dead' CVS repositories to exclude - for example, apache-1.2 isn't active any more...
My only other comment would be not to bold ASF members. There's no good reason (IMHO) to distinguish them here.
If I get time, I might take a pass at Sam's perl script and tweaking it accordingly. If someone beats me, great. =)
Other than that, it's a great step in the right direction! Go Sam! =) -- justin
