-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> [Moved from infrastructure@ at DWvG's suggestion] > > > I continue to feel a bit disenchanted with the group of folks "I don't > > see need for this, -1" for various efforts, where non-participation > > would be the most appropriate (IMHO) avenue of "protest". > > Excuse me, Andrew, but you *are* aware that except for a technical issue > a -1 is non-binding, right? People are just casting their votes for or > against. What is the problem with someone saying that they disagree with > your view? Why is that obstructionist? This is a Community. If the > majority disagrees with you, is that obstructionist? > > You did a good job of getting a wiki going here, so you can hardly argue > that everyone is trying to preserve the status quo. But the issue of blogs > and personal pages has come up multiple times in the few months that I have > had Committer status, so I am sure that you have seen the arguments before > now. For those of us that are not on infrastructure@, what's the summary thus far? Is it just the obvious which can be gleaned from the above, ie Andy proposed blog software installed on an apache.org machine and someone - -1'ed it, or was it merely a page linking to blogs? Just curious what we're talking about here. - -- Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth And danced the sky on laughter-silvered wings --High Flight (John Gillespie Magee) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD8DBQE+MyJuXP03+sx4yJMRAnvdAJ91TzBbPojqAg8JVfADq5FHRcQBAQCg9oij 9jLkqKEgZqvLTOScuqS6A0g= =kcDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
