Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > OK, Java-specific question. It seems likely that > > altering or inlining LGPL code pollutes the Apache > > license. Are you of the opinion that IMPORTING but > > not altering or distributing LGPL classes pollutes the > > Apache licecnse? And if so, can that be stated on the > > Wiki page? If LGPL code cannot be imported, it's > > pretty much useless in any capacity for Java projects. > > > > > Refer to Roy's messages of yesterday. Importing is enough to disallow > the code from use within ASF code. > > > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1419 > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=1429
As I understand it, class loading the code via configuration files (e.g. _not_ referencing the (L)GPL'd code in our .java sources at all) would be okay. -- Daniel Rall <[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
