I'm all +1 on moving our repositories forward, but I've got used to some
of the nice tools surrounding SVN that I don't want to miss.
And then there is the question of things like maven supporting SVN just
as well as CVS.
For bk there is some sort of "CVS compatible read-only view into the
repository". Is this possible for SVN, too?
Regards
Henning
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 10:16, Sander Striker wrote:
> > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:00 AM
>
> > Greg Stein wrote, On 10/06/2003 21.01:
> >> <ObPlug>
> >> Use Subversion.
> >> </ObPlug>
> >>
> >> :-)
> >
> > <Cry4Help>
> > Release the baby!
> > </Cry4Help>
> >
> > ;-)
>
> Once Karl has finished up the branch/tag support in cvs2svn we can
> do some experimenting with converting cvs repositories. This is
> the major obstacle, the price of not being able to look at history,
> unless going back to some cvs graveyard, when moving to svn at this
> point in time. Hence the wait for cvs2svn to be finished.
>
> And then there is the community backing. Each project has to have
> enough people wanting to move away from cvs, over to subversion.
> I haven't done any polling, but I've a hunch that it won't be an
> objectionless transition for all.
>
>
> Sander
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
