Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: <snip/> > > But my biggest concern is about false positives. > > One solution would be to use spamassassin for tagging purposes only, but > at that point it's much better to let people do the filtering > themselves. There is no reason in wasting precious CPU power for that. > > A more socially-acceptable compromise would be to leave the "threshold > level" of the cutoff point to the various people to set (you could set a > .spam_threshold file in your home directory with the cut-off point). So, > if you keep the threshold low and complain, well, that was your own fault.
I would prefer to see server-side filtering because i don't want to even receive the volume of junk. It is a big waste of precious bandwidth. Surely we can tune SA to minimise false-positives, especially since we have the experts themselves at Apache. --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
