Brian Behlendorf dijo: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> Brian Behlendorf dijo: >> > Yeah, me too. But even with aggressive filtering I still get 200-300 >> a >> > day. I abandoned my [EMAIL PROTECTED] address for this reason. >> >> This is why I think we need to go hard on spam policies. Please, turn on >> spamassassin. :-D > > This is post-spamassassin.
I wonder if this a post spamassassin (I assume then "better") why he is sending me spam that on spamassassin ranks more than 40 points! > And jeez, lay off the demands on volunteers, already. Not understand this. Are you asking help? I gladly will volunteer on that. > You're coming > across very poorly, and I'll assume that's not your intention. You're > acting very much like someone who has no idea what it means to just "turn > on" something for 800 active users. I told before that I already setted some anti-virus, anti-spam appliances for more than 20 companies. Ranging from just 20 to 10,000 users. Is this diferent than for 800 users? I really don't think so. You need to see the crappy hardware you got on the appliance just for US$ 5,000 - US$ 80,000. I guess the new IBM machines are better than this and yes there is inside the appliance is a SA version. > If you're not happy, you can run it > yourself, today, on minotaur. /usr/local/bin/spamassassin. Thanks for the tip. I will be glad to try it. :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
