Hi Sean,

An iterator definitely makes sense, as a monolithic geomcollection is generally 
not the desired product from the operation.  Thanks incorporating the changes; 
I'll keep them coming.

Cheers!

Nino

Sean Gillies wrote:
...


>
> Hi Nino,
>
> Thanks for the code. I committed something very much like it to the
> trunk along with enhancements to the GeometryCollection class that will
> let you access the polygons produced by the operation:
>
> http://trac.gispython.org/projects/PCL/changeset/1105
>
> Cheers,
> Sean

Nino,

What would you think about polygonize() returning an iterator over
polygons rather than a geometry collection?

Sean
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
_______________________________________________
Community mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Reply via email to