I agree. Brent Pederson just helped me find and fix another bug, so I think we'll release 1.0.5 soon.
Nino Walker wrote: > Hi Sean, > > An iterator definitely makes sense, as a monolithic geomcollection is > generally not the desired product from the operation. Thanks incorporating > the changes; I'll keep them coming. > > Cheers! > > Nino > > Sean Gillies wrote: > ... > > >> Hi Nino, >> >> Thanks for the code. I committed something very much like it to the >> trunk along with enhancements to the GeometryCollection class that will >> let you access the polygons produced by the operation: >> >> http://trac.gispython.org/projects/PCL/changeset/1105 >> >> Cheers, >> Sean > > Nino, > > What would you think about polygonize() returning an iterator over > polygons rather than a geometry collection? > > Sean _______________________________________________ Community mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gispython.org/mailman/listinfo/community
